Nikon D2H

Review Date
November 14, 2009

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Reviewed by
thedill , Professional

Price Paid
$400.00 at ebay

Photography Experience
21+ years , Outdoor

Summary
I bought a secondhand D2h from ebay in imaculate condition and ive had it for over a year now. I have to say it was well worth the money for despite its relatively low pixel rating compared to more modern cameras it produces pin sharp images up to A3 size. Its built like a tank and is a breeze to use, its also lightning fast. It does suffer from a minor blip when starting up, an 'err' symbol sometimes shows up on the lcd screen which dissapears after depressing the shutter and after that its fine for the rest of the day. Overall, brilliant, why pay thousands for a camera which isnt built better but has a very high pixel count? after all I dont produce bill board sized prints, do you?

Strengths
Build quality
ergonomics
ease of use

Weaknesses
none

Similar Products Used
Nikon D200

Customer Service
Havent needed any.

Report this review >>

Review Date
June 20, 2009

Overall Rating
 3 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
3 Months to 1 year

Visitors rate this review
5.00 of 5, 1 votes

Reviewed by
sfpeter , Intermediate

Price Paid
$650.00 at KEH

Photography Experience
6-10 years , Outdoor

Summary
The D2H is in a neither here nor there state in modern photography. It was intended to replace the D1H as the flagship high speed journalist/sports camera, and it did that well for it's time. However, that was six years ago, and the low resolution now counts against it. Whether or not you will find the camera useful depends on what you expect from it.

To clear up some confusion about Nikon's naming scheme, the original pro DSLR was the D1, followed by the D1H (high speed), D1X (high resolution) and D100 (advanced amateur.) Nikon never made a D2, but did make the D200/D2X/D2H and an improved D2Hs. The scheme is even more tangled in the D3 series as the D700 is really the camera the D300 should have been.

Strengths
High frame rate, 8FPS is fast even today.

Can meter with manual focus lenses, which is programmed in the menus. This is a very important feature to me and the sole reason I got this camera, as a backup to my D700.

Uses the still current EN-EL4a battery that is used by the D3 and as an option in the D700's battery grip.

It has very good ergonomics, fitting your hand well and is lighter than a D700 with it's battery grip and I believe also the D3.

Is essentially still a "modern" Nikon, so anyone using a newer pro body will feel right at home with it, and can shoot in jpegs or raw as needed.

Has a Type III compact flash slot, so you can use either Compact Flash or SD cards in those Type III adapters all over the place on Ebay. 2GB will be plenty for this camera.

Weaknesses
My example has 94,000 on the shutter count and has the "lazy first shot" problem where the first shot of the day results in an "err" message, as the shutter sticks on closing. Pressing the shutter button again finishes it and the camera is good for the rest of the day. Set it down for a few hours and it comes back. When researching how much it would cost to replace the shutter I've found this is a problem that sometimes comes back even when the shutter is fixed, and have decided to ignore it until the thing actually breaks.

The D2H has issues with noise at higher ISO settings and is not really a good camera for low light shooting. I believe this is due to the limitations of the technology at the time and the camera's emphasis on speed.

At this stage of the game 4MP can be considered a liability, but it depends on how the pictures are used. If you don't use heavy cropping/enlarging then it won't matter.

The camera has a separate white balance sensor and "tone compensation" settings that I believe are contrast/balance curves applied to jpegs and tiffs. Raw files do not use these.

The tone compensation was used on the D1 series but is absent on newer cameras, on the D2H it's essentially another option to have to be aware of and adjust as needed.

Similar Products Used
D50, D90, D700.

Customer Service
Haven't used yet, I checked the shutter issues in newsgroups.

Report this review >>

Review Date
February 3, 2009

Overall Rating
 5 of 5

Value Rating
 5 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Reviewed by
privers , Expert

Price Paid
$1500.00 at Used

Photography Experience
21+ years , Outdoor

Summary
This is a great camera. The speed, build quality, ergonomics, durability, and images are all first rate. I also own a D3 and D300, and I find I favor the D2h under most circumstances. It is not as complex as the newer cameras, but produces excellent images when shooting RAW. Also, the small image files make post processing very fast. I've produced some of my best shots with this camera. On the down side, low light photography is a real challenge with this camera, but I use the other cameras for that. This is one of the great tools, and if you have an opportunity to pick one up, I highly recommend it.

Strengths
Speed, durability, battery life, ergonomics, image quality (even at 4 mp), and "feel"

Weaknesses
low light performance

Similar Products Used
D3, D200, D300

Customer Service
not had any experience, but overall I hear good things

Report this review >>

Review Date
February 17, 2008

Overall Rating
 4 of 5

Value Rating
 4 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
1.00 of 5, 1 votes

Reviewed by
greg mclemore , Expert

Price Paid
$3000.00 at Samys Cameras

Photography Experience
21+ years , Outdoor

Summary
Love the camera, the speed, the accurate exposure, the built quality, I also have a Canon 20D & Nikon D200, but still using the D2H, love the image quality, as for as 10X8, its as good as the others.

Strengths
Speed
Built quality
image quality

Weaknesses
Heavy
hi iso performance if you don't get the exposure correct

Similar Products Used
Nikon D200
Canon 20D

Customer Service
na

Report this review >>

Review Date
December 29, 2007

Overall Rating
 1 of 5

Value Rating
 1 of 5

Used product for
More than 1 year

Visitors rate this review
1.17 of 5, 6 votes

Reviewed by
tekkamaki , Professional

Price Paid
$4000.00 at Roberts Dist.

Photography Experience
21+ years , Sports

Summary
I am very dissapointed in all recent Nikon Cameras, and the d2 is no exception. The autofocus is auful in low light and the color balance setting are all off. The flash system is not as good as it used to be. The one bright spot for Nikon is the Battery system on the newer cameras.

If you are trying to decide between Nikon and Canon, do yourself a favor and buy a Canon.

I am stuck using Nikon's because my employer (a daily newspaper) supply's them.

Strengths
Battery like is much inproved over the D1h

Weaknesses
Color Balance is poor, Flash sysem has gotten worse not better in past 10 years, Nikon autofocus is 15 years behind Canon.

Similar Products Used
D1h, d200, D300, Various Canon products

Customer Service
Nikon customer service has been poor IMPO, it has taken 3 trips to the shop to fix a 300 mm 2.8 lens used by our company. Nikon is slow with service.

Report this review >>